DerSam24 wrote:
Your claims are taken out of context.
Those are facts, not "claims": (1) version from 2009 is available on SourceForge
sourceforge.net/projects/thinkingrock/fi...kingRock/TR%202.2.1/ and (2) the 2009 code base has permissive license to freely develop it further.
These are facts, plain and simple.
Now to the claims:
DerSam24 wrote:
The development of TR has been stagnating for years now. People here would be willing to pay money if new features were added. But apparently the development doesn't pay off for the vendors of this software. Or can you tell me what new features have been added in the last few years?
For example, I would like to be able to print out my goals or export them as PDF. I've wanted this feature for several years now.
That's why I jumped ship years ago from my paid TR account to alternative solution, which is open source and being intensively developed further.
But I totally respect your right to offer more money to TR developers, despite this has been unsuccessful for about a year (?) so far.
DerSam24 wrote:
Using the code from 2009 is just like using an iPhone from 2009, most people wouldn't be happy with it. I would like the software to be further developed and would also be willing to pay for it, including an annual subscription. The developers should earn money with it, so that it pays off. Nobody should work for free.
The idea of releasing the code is only meant if the developers decide not to develop anything further. There was a similar case with the Blender 3D code back then and people are grateful for it today. I myself don't need the code because I'm not a developer, but a user and would like to have the often desired features added. I'm grateful for this software and what the developers have created, we just want information about the future plans for the software.
You and I have paid for this software already. Which product have we got? The product which could not properly catch up with latest version of JAVA to start with. Then you might want to re-iterate the "I've wanted this feature for several years now" claim of yours to round up the impression of this deal.
The amount of feedback from developers is pretty much self-explanatory. Plus the latest I've seen from developers remotely related to 'strategy' of moving forward is
www.trgtd.com.au/index.php/kunena/4-sugg...ly/6839?quote=1#6849 and its basically (1) you are not getting the TR source code (2) anything else developers might have a look at someday. Good luck.